<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAMSHAFT DURATION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/771/camshaft-duration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/771/camshaft-duration/</link>
	<description>Specific mission-critical info for professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/771/camshaft-duration/comment-page-1/#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/771/camshaft-duration/#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>The Helical Camshaft can perform about 90% of the useful "tricks" that a "camless" can do and being a purely mechanical system it is much more easily applied to existing engines than a "camless" system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Helical Camshaft can perform about 90% of the useful &#8220;tricks&#8221; that a &#8220;camless&#8221; can do and being a purely mechanical system it is much more easily applied to existing engines than a &#8220;camless&#8221; system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance NIST</title>
		<link>http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/771/camshaft-duration/comment-page-1/#comment-2961</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance NIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/771/camshaft-duration/#comment-2961</guid>
		<description>I have FOUR patents stating HOW "camless" valve operation is done correctly.

My son Eric is the youngest man in the world to operate a "camless" engine. (AURA 1993).

Sure, we can open the valve to "max-lift" in 1-2 a ms (.002ms), THAT IS NOT BEST. 

The prefered method is a "low-lift" dither to match the air velocity needed by port size (inertia).
This method will also SAVE WORK !
Lance NIST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have FOUR patents stating HOW &#8220;camless&#8221; valve operation is done correctly.</p>
<p>My son Eric is the youngest man in the world to operate a &#8220;camless&#8221; engine. (AURA 1993).</p>
<p>Sure, we can open the valve to &#8220;max-lift&#8221; in 1-2 a ms (.002ms), THAT IS NOT BEST. </p>
<p>The prefered method is a &#8220;low-lift&#8221; dither to match the air velocity needed by port size (inertia).<br />
This method will also SAVE WORK !<br />
Lance NIST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

