<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You’ve never had it so good!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/474/you%e2%80%99ve-never-had-it-so-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/474/you%e2%80%99ve-never-had-it-so-good/</link>
	<description>Specific mission-critical info for professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Proffitt</title>
		<link>http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/474/you%e2%80%99ve-never-had-it-so-good/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Proffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ret-monitor.com/articles/?p=474#comment-163</guid>
		<description>It's about time someone put this much needed information out! Especially when one considers how much effect the camshaft has on an engine. Leaving design parameters up to what the camshaft manufactures think an engine should have leaves out the builders input in my humble opinion. 

Thank you John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time someone put this much needed information out! Especially when one considers how much effect the camshaft has on an engine. Leaving design parameters up to what the camshaft manufactures think an engine should have leaves out the builders input in my humble opinion. </p>
<p>Thank you John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

